- Hannah Gutierrez-Reed files motion for new trial or dismissal of conviction
- Alleges “egregious prosecutorial misconduct” similar to Alec Baldwin case
- Claims crucial evidence was suppressed, including undisclosed interview and expert report
- The prosecution defends its actions, but defense argues evidence could have altered trial outcome
- Motion emphasizes importance of fair trial and upholding constitutional standards
In a shocking turn of events, Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the armorer for the movie “Rust,” has filed a motion seeking a new trial or dismissal of her conviction, citing “egregious prosecutorial misconduct” similar to the case that led to the dismissal of Alec Baldwin’s charges.

Wiki and Bio Details
Name | Hannah Gutierrez-Reed |
Occupation | Movie Armorer |
Conviction | Involuntary Manslaughter |
Case | Shooting death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of “Rust” |
Motion Filed | Seeking new trial or dismissal of conviction |
Allegations | “Egregious prosecutorial misconduct” and suppression of crucial evidence |
See Also | Who Is JD Vance’s Wife And Net Worth? A look at Donald Trump’s possible VP pick’s fortune
The Alleged Misconduct
Gutierrez-Reed’s defense counsel, Jason Bowles, has argued that crucial evidence was suppressed by prosecutors, jeopardizing the fairness of her trial. Bowles claims that an undisclosed interview and a report by a state’s expert witness, which could have significantly influenced the trial’s outcome, were not provided to the defense team.
The Baldwin Case Connection
The motion draws a parallel between the alleged misconduct in Gutierrez-Reed’s case and the recent dismissal of Baldwin’s case due to withheld evidence. Bowles emphasizes that the absence of this crucial information during the trial impacted their ability to challenge key witnesses effectively.
The Prosecution’s Response
In response to the defense’s allegations, lead prosecutor Kari Morrissey has stated that the evidence withheld was irrelevant to Gutierrez-Reed’s defense strategy. However, Bowles argues that this evidence could have been pivotal in undermining the prosecution’s case and casting doubt on the circumstances of the tragic incident.
The Importance of a Fair Trial
Bowles concludes by highlighting the detrimental impact of the alleged discovery failures on Gutierrez-Reed’s case, underscoring the need for a fair and just legal process. The motion emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional standards and ensuring a level playing field in criminal proceedings.

FAQs
Q. What is the basis of Hannah Gutierrez-Reed’s motion?
Gutierrez-Reed alleges “egregious prosecutorial misconduct” and suppression of crucial evidence, similar to the Alec Baldwin case.
Q. What specific evidence was allegedly withheld?
An undisclosed interview and a report by a state’s expert witness that could have significantly influenced the trial’s outcome.
Q. How does this connect to the Alec Baldwin case?
The motion draws a parallel between the alleged misconduct in Gutierrez-Reed’s case and the recent dismissal of Baldwin’s case due to withheld evidence.
Q. What is the prosecution’s response?
The prosecution defends its actions, stating that the evidence withheld was irrelevant to Gutierrez-Reed’s defense strategy.
Q. What is the significance of this motion?
The motion emphasizes the importance of a fair trial and upholding constitutional standards, ensuring a level playing field in criminal proceedings.
See Also | Tragic Encounter: Tourist Dies from Deadly Spider Bite in Brazil