Chelsea hope Romelu Lukaku’s lucky goal can spur the Belgium hitman into top form and drive the Blues to a maiden Club World Cup crown.
Lukaku pounced on Yasir Alshahrani’s moment of misfortune to blast home and seal Chelsea’s 1-0 Club World Cup semi-final win over Saudi Arabia’s Al Hilal.
Chelsea’s £98million club-record signing Lukaku ended a five-game goal drought at Abu Dhabi’s Mohammed Bin Zayed Stadium, turning home the decisive strike as the Blues were made to grind their way to victory.
Zsolt Low (above) was responsible for guiding Chelsea to their 1-0 victory after manager Thomas Tuchel tested positive for Covid-19 ahead of the Club World Cup tie
Both the Blues and their Brazilian opponents in the final Palmeiras are chasing their first Club World Cup triumph, but assistant Chelsea boss Zsolt Low hailed Lukaku for handing his side their shot at glory.
‘Everyone’s very happy he scored, he fought very hard and tried hard in the game,’ said Low.
‘That’s why we give him the chance all the time. We hoped for a bit of luck to score today.
‘He’s very happy, we’re very happy and hope he continues and scores in the final.’
Chelsea laboured to the win, albeit while still deserving to progress to the final.
Riyadh side Al Hilal pushed the Blues right to the limit however, amid impressive management from their accomplished boss Leonardo Jardim.
Low was ‘very happy’ with Romelu Lukaku’s performance against Al Hilal on Wednesday night. He felt the striker has ‘given everything’ to help Chelsea win their semi-final
Kepa Arrizabalaga produced two fine saves amid another assured performance, and will doubtless push Edouard Mendy all the way for the starting goalkeeping berth in Saturday’s final.
‘We worked very hard, we missed a bit of freedom and rhythm,’ said Low.
‘We started a little nervous, it was not easy. We fought hard for it to find a solution.
‘My opinion is the solution was there but we didn’t find it easily. We missed a bit of rhythm in this game but we fought hard to get the result and reach the final.
‘This competition is very important for the club. The players felt the pressure and that’s why we failed to find the easy solution and score goals.
‘The players did well. We didn’t concede and had a lot of opportunities to score a second.’
Blues manager Tuchel was forced to watch the match at home in London on television given his isolation.
The Chelsea coach also said Kai Havertz looked ‘dangerous in attack against Al Hilal
But the Blues assistants kept in touch on phones and spoke to the head coach at half-time, with hopes still intact that Tuchel could yet make it to Abu Dhabi in time for the final.
‘We hope Thomas can travel as soon as possible,’ said Low.
‘As I said before he’ll follow the government rules. He’s in self-isolation now and doing a Covid PCR test every day.
‘Once he tests negative it opens the possibility to travel.
‘Every day we wait for it. We wish he can come to the enjoy the final.
‘We talked to Thomas at half-time and had a good conversation. He had the same feeling that we were a little nervous and had a lot of easy ball losses.
‘We talked about telling the guys to calm down, find the rhythm and not fight so hard for solutions.
‘We had a good conversation. After the game we’ve not spoken yet; maybe a bit later we can talk to each other.’
Low said Thomas Tuchel dialled into the half-time team talk and calmed the players down
Alshahrani’s inadvertent knockdown allowed Lukaku to fire the winner in a cagey affair in the United Arab Emirates.
Deflated Al Hilal boss Jardim insisted Alshahrani could not be held solely accountable for the loss however, praising his players for handing Chelsea a genuine test.
‘Defeats are felt as a group; he was surprised by the ball and couldn’t then do anything about it,’ said Jardim.
‘I’m sure he will be disappointed but he doesn’t carry that alone or by himself.
When we lose and when we win, we lose and we win together.
‘In strategy we obtained more control of the match.
‘We had greater openings and more time on the ball but they were more effective.
‘The difference was efficacy; for sure Chelsea were more effective and that’s why they won 1-0.’
